ABSTRACT
Introduction: Recent advances in endoscopic paraphernalia have brought the once intricate anterior lateral wall of maxilla, within reach of the endoscopic surgeon. Endoscopic modified Denker's approach provides another route to reach the indiscernible sites of maxillary & other paranasal sinuses along with PPF (pterygo-palatine fossa)/ITF (infra-temporal fossa) region. This approach has been widely used Pan-India during the Post-Covid Mucormycosis Epidemic, in our country. As this approach mandates sacrifice of nasolacrimal duct, the suspicion in some quarters about post-op fibrosis and eventually obstruction of lacrimal drainage is genuine. Aim: The aim is to understand the legitimate effect of this approach on lacrimal drainage pathway and to determine the need for modification in this approach, like stenting the NLD. Materials and Methods: In total, 100 patients who underwent endoscopic modified Denker's maxillectomy for invasive rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis were included in study. The patency of lacrimal drainage was checked by doing lacrimal sac syringing in each patient. Proportion of patients showing obstruction of lacrimal pathway was calculated. Result: The ratio of lacrimal obstruction was found to be 9%. Hence, endoscopic modified Denker's approach for lesions involving anteroinferior and anterolateral part of maxillary sinus does not cause significant obstruction in the lacrimal drainage pathway.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To compare the post-cataract endophthalmitis (PCE) rates among eyes undergoing syringing or regurgitation on pressure over the lacrimal sac (ROPLAS) test prior to cataract surgery. Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective, comparative analysis of eyes developing PCE who underwent syringing prior to cataract surgery (group A) in the pre-COVID-19 era between November 1 2019 and January 31, 2020 and the eyes that underwent ROPLAS test prior to cataract surgery (group B) in the COVID-19 era between November 1, 2020 and January 31, 2021. Results: A total of 87,144 eyes underwent cataract surgery during the two time periods of the study. Syringing was performed in 48,071 eyes, whereas ROPLAS was performed in 39,073 eyes. In group A, 19 eyes (0.039%) developed PCE, whereas 20 eyes (0.051%) developed PCE in group B (P = 0.517). Between the two groups, the grade of anterior chamber cellular reaction (P = 0.675), hypopyon (P = 0.738), and vitreous haze (P = 0.664) were comparable. Gram-positive organisms were detected in 4 eyes in group A and 6 eyes in group B; 2 eyes in group A had gram-negative bacilli. The presenting visual acuity (Group A: LogMAR 1.42 and Group B: LogMAR 1.30) and final visual acuity (Group A: LogMAR 0.52 and Group B: LogMAR 0.5) were comparable between the two groups. (P = 0.544 and 0.384, respectively). Conclusion: The rates of PCE were comparable among the eyes undergoing either syringing test or ROPLAS prior to cataract surgery.